Why not shift a focus on smaller steps, not simple extrapolations, as if any senses could be captured by predicting patterns based on acquired habitats, sampled in order to consume rather than to accept.
Benefiting from an acknowledgement of connections, understood as mutual and yet understandably loose, the key being beholden only to unrestricted binds.
Taught to be taut, when the fist opens up, readily hastened, when the need coincides with the willing effort, but not without the energy of the impulse.
Knowingly, the passage will mostly resemble lapses in the conscious recognition of oneself, reflected namely for the sake of providing indications, some denominations meant to pinpoint specific meanings.
Therewith definitions slide off the lighter frames headed, yet with questions as to a precise purpose assumed to be attributable, toward limited formats tensed often enough to establish a custom, a bind.
About the capacity to transform needs into wanting regenerated completely, with but impetus leftovers extenuated unto accumulations, cluttering volumes.
Keeping on with that fixation on accrued rationale inculcated, because what develops outside its self needs at least an other else it does not propagate delimited actions as far or fair as you can reach.
So senses are not at fault, if equipped with sense especially cognizant, yet not exclusively inclined nor invested in such tightly summarized reasonings seemingly slanted so as to cause slippery abandon, excising roots, like those, resembling principles.
[2021/06/01-30]