The result seems to indicate the cumulative effect as the predominant consideration retained by minds too segmented to pause enough to reflect with some inkling of thinking within the patterns of reasons always suggested rather than displayed in clarity.
To enter willingly for example into places leveled only on planes limited to words but not intentions when these are ultimately uncovered by the actions enacted so consciously so as to roll over rational thoughts but because of repetition end up as norm.
So that overlap is the most conspicuously constant attribute never even observed with some curiosity, and subsequently hardly ever named or undeciphered thusly acquiring a sheen approximating immobility, still in order to seem as if naturally determined.
And yet, or even so acceptive of a most basic lie, carried very physically from one life to the next, which in the process permeates every ensuant step, all interactions subjected to distinguishing rules as subtle as eliciting outrage from any indignity.
Where is possibility except in purposeful shedding once the rationale fails to lead, benefiting fewer in favor of sections defined by superficial traits serving to promote confusion, difference as threat instead of distinctions exposing unique qualities.
Which is to say that the ruckus is on a continuum, for when can any lucidity hope to shine on its own without, for instance, a so necessary counterpoint to bolster or dishevel the purported postulations, that, when handled with civility can surely edify. Or even more plainly: question, but proffer it up.
(2020/03/01-31)