If it is true that action and reaction do coexist, what happens then to make a thought happily desist and rely instead only on a self referenced motion, belying any claim on rationales beyond some notion fabricated for the purpose of calling it an intent when at most transitory understandings can prevent an effort to arrive at a state based in sincerity, while the evidence reveals the benefits of clarity as can be applied to move the more stoic attitudes so inclined to ignore the most obvious platitudes.
The general situation indicates a need for repairs against that similarly scoped action that impairs, inhibiting thinking that opens up to consideration of the possibilities afforded by some deliberation as concerns an existence of fact based acceptance, while the emphasis is not rooted in its importance or a wonder that can result when a focus is turned around from what we are convinced we have learned, leaning in not on the comfort of a mirror sequence but rather reflecting on the fortune in frequence.
A pause could cause a loosening of just you molds, occasioning connections releasing that which holds an interest in distinguishable attributes that sum no aggregations but rather the differences to some and so accentuating the separation that could bind each particular being with keeping a whole in mind within every particle, the realization of complete movements aimed at goals that tend not to compete, a fullness attained perhaps through a satisfaction obtained most indubitably by avoiding an inaction.
[November 01-30, 2020]